
The violence that took place in Murshidabad, West Bengal, was discussed all over the country. During this violence, there was a lot of vandalism and arson. During this, 3 people were killed and many were injured. After the incident, a large number of people from the Hindu community migrated. A petition was also filed in the Supreme Court regarding the violence in Murshidabad. However, the Supreme Court has refused to hear these petitions on Monday. The court has asked the petitioners to file a proper petition.
One has to be careful while filing a petition- SC
During the hearing in the Supreme Court on the petition against the violence in Murshidabad, West Bengal, Justice Kant said that the Supreme Court is a court of record. Future generations will see it. You think it will be reported etc., but you have to be careful while filing a petition or passing an order. Is it necessary to have these statements? We respect every member of the bar. But with a sense of responsibility.
What did the lawyer say?
During the hearing, lawyer Shashank Shekhar said, "I had filed the petition on the Palghar sadhus case. This is a case of violation of human rights and the law and order situation in the state is very bad." The Supreme Court asked where did you get the information from? Is this correct? On this, the lawyer said that it is based on media reports. Lawyer Shashank said that people are on the streets there. The Supreme Court said that you are in a hurry. On this, the lawyer said, allow me to withdraw the petition and make amendments.
Instructions for filing appropriate petition
After this, the Supreme Court has refused to hear the petitions related to the violence in Murshidabad. The court has asked both the petitioners to file a proper petition. The court reprimanded the lawyers and advised them to file proper petitions responsibly. The court has given them the freedom to withdraw their case and file a case with better material and statements.
--Advertisement--