During the Lok Sabha debate, Rahul Gandhi received Akhilesh Yadav's support on this issue, leading to a huge uproar.: Rahul Gandhi raised such a topic on which he got the support of SP chief Akhilesh Yadav amidst the uproar and objection from the ruling party.

News Topical, Digital Desk : During the Lok Sabha debate on the Budget Session of Parliament, Leader of the Opposition and Indian National Congress leader Rahul Gandhi raised the Doklam issue. When the ruling party raised an uproar and expressed objections, he received support from Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav. In the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi was referring to a book by former Army Chief General Naravane, which has not yet been published.

As soon as Rae Bareli MP Rahul Gandhi mentioned former Army Chief Naravane's unpublished book on the Doklam issue, the ruling party erupted in uproar and objected. Amidst this, Kannauj MP Akhilesh Yadav stated that the China issue is sensitive. Akhilesh demanded that Rahul Gandhi be allowed to read former Army Chief MM Naravane's statement.

What is the whole matter?

On Monday, February 2nd, Rahul Gandhi raised the issue of Doklam and China during the debate on the President's address, drawing strong objection from Defense Minister Rajnath Singh. As Rahul Gandhi began referring to Doklam, Rajnath Singh pointed out that the subject was not mentioned in the President's address and that raising such issues was inconsistent with the rules.

He also questioned whether the book Rahul Gandhi is referring to has been published. Singh said that the book being referenced regarding former Army Chief General Naravane has not yet been published. Whether the book being referred to has been published or not remains to be seen. The Speaker also ruled that the statement cannot be read.

During the Lok Sabha debate, Rahul Gandhi questioned what was being hidden from the book being referenced and why the government was afraid of the report. He alleged that Chinese army tanks had entered Indian territory. He also said that he had not originally intended to raise the issue, but felt compelled to speak out after a young member questioned the Congress party's patriotism and understanding of Indian culture.