img

Donald Trump's new statement has created a stir in America. Donald Trump has expressed his desire to contest elections for the third time in an interview. He says that despite the constitutional ban, he can contest for the third term. This statement of Trump has sparked a new debate in America.

 

I am not kidding

Donald Trump gave a phone interview to NBC News on Sunday. He made this statement in this interview. Trump said that there are ways in which you can do this. He said that I am not joking. But it is too early to think about this.

 

No one can become president more than twice

According to CBS News, the 22nd Constitutional Amendment was made in the US in 1951. Under this, no person can become the President of the US more than twice.

 

The ban was imposed after Roosevelt's four terms

This ban was imposed after Franklin D. Roosevelt became president for four consecutive times. Now Trump is in the mood to challenge this law. There is growing concern in America about whether Donald Trump will challenge the 1951 constitutional amendment.

 

Trump is also being criticized

Trump's statement is also being criticized in America. Representative Daniel Goldman called it an increase in a clear effort to capture the government and destroy democracy. Goldman appealed to the Republicans in Congress to oppose Trump's ambitions. He said that if the Republicans in Congress believe in the Constitution, then they should openly oppose Trump's ambition to come to power for a third time.

 

Where did the talk of a third term arise from?

Let us tell you that Steve Bannon, who runs the War Room podcast, had said a few days ago at the Conservative Political Action Conference that we want to see Trump again in 2028. Steve Bannon has also been Donald Trump's strategist. Jeremy Paul, a professor of constitutional law at Northeastern University in Boston, believes that there is no credible legal argument in favor of Trump becoming president for the third time.


Read More: IMF gave 1 billion dollar loan to Pakistan, why India could not vote against the package; know the reason

--Advertisement--