desk
Share
News Topical, Digital Desk : If consumers are aware, no one can infringe on their rights. Ajay Jha, a resident of Gurung Basti in Siliguri, Bengal, has proven this. He fought a legal battle for years and recovered more than double the amount the company had defrauded him.
In fact, Ajay Jha purchased an LED TV on May 3, 2016, using a loan from Capital Finance Company. Starting in June of that year, he was scheduled to pay a monthly installment of ₹1,606. The finance company began deducting the amount from Ajay Jha's bank account.
The company management had already made him sign the checks and kept them. When one of the EMI checks bounced, he contacted the bank and learned that the finance company had wrongly deducted ₹400 from his account.
When a second check was presented, the extra amount was bounced. Furthermore, an investigation revealed that from June to November, the company deducted extra money from his bank account 15 times, sometimes 100, sometimes 400, totaling 1983.30 rupees. He complained to the finance company management but no action was taken. Then he took legal recourse. The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission dismissed the case.
Ajay first got his account frozen after talking to the bank management. He sent an email to the finance company requesting a solution to the problem, but the Kanchani representative threatened to drag him to the Lok Adalat. Then Ajay filed an application for a case in the District Consumer Affairs Commission on 13 December 2016 along with the documents. The Commission rejected it. He appealed to the Redressal Commission. On the SD order, the DCRC filed a case and started the hearing. Kahnes Company for Rs 1563 30.
The company could not prove the deductions with evidence. On January 16, 2005, the finance company was ordered to refund the wrongly deducted relief amount along with six percent annual interest. Five thousand rupees were also ordered to compensate the consumer for the mental and financial distress caused by the dispute, including the impact on his credit score, and five thousand rupees for the expenses incurred in fighting the case. An order was also given to deposit two thousand rupees into Ayon's account.
Retaliation against injustice is necessary, otherwise consumers will continue to be cheated.
Ajay says it's not just about a thousand rupees, but about our rights. It's about raising our voice against injustice. The finance company was collecting the EMI along with interest on the loan on the scheduled dates each month, so why the extra deduction? (Mohan Jha from Siliguri)
With the expanding market and increasing dependence on services, consumers often encounter situations where a seemingly minor error can have a profound impact. Sometimes, money is deducted from their bank account without reason, sometimes a finance company charges extra fees, or sometimes, a seemingly simple online service.
It undermines a consumer's faith and trust. Most people compromise in such situations, but when a citizen, understanding their rights, chooses the legal path, that small complaint can become a major example of injustice. Incidents like these from Bengal, Punjab, and Uttar Pradesh demonstrate that consumer rights are not confined to law books.
If we rely on evidence and the legal process, even ordinary consumers can hold large companies and organizations accountable. This awareness is emerging as the true strength of consumer rights today.
A major decision was made on a minor complaint.
The Ludhiana incident exemplifies the importance of awareness in the age of online services. A seemingly simple complaint about incorrect food delivery served as a significant example of protecting consumer rights. The Consumer Forum ordered the food delivery platform and the restaurant to jointly pay 50,000 rupees in compensation.
--Advertisement--
